
(Contributed - by Joel Simon)
Brief: Single-staged HPR rocket, built
for Level 2 certification. Piston-deployed parachute recovery. No payload
capability in kit form.
Construction: The parts were all there and in excellent condition.
The Pterodactyl is actually a fairly basic HPR kit, except for the fins. So the
parts consisted of main airframe, six G10 fin components, motor tube, 3
centering rings, nose cone, and piston assembly.
Instructions were surprisingly good; complete and accurate. Construction
gave me very few "huh?" moments. Fit of all parts was dead on.
The kit does contain one massive 'gotcha', and one 'I wish I'd thought of
this before I bought this !@#$! kit factor. Both involve the fins: one in
construction, one in finishing.
Each fin is two-piece. The main section (rear) is a conventional
double-swept design that has a tab extending through the airframe slot to the
motor tube. The front section is a design accent which extends along the
airframe and dwindles to a point. This section is only tabbed in its rear,
about 1/3 of its length. The two sections fit together perfectly; PML really
did a nice job. BUT...Getting them perfectly aligned so that they look like one
fin is a real challenge. and while you're obsessing about that, you'll find
that the untabbed part of the forward fin (the point) is warping. I ended up
having to tape the front part of the forward fins down, so that they'd epoxy on
straight.
The kit doesn't come with any method of motor retention. I bought an
Aero-pac retaining ring set before beginning construction.
Finishing: When you've got the fins all glued on and the fillets
cured, you'll learn that you've just committed yourself to sanding more than
18' (that's feet, not inches) of fin fillets. That's right, the fins extend
more than half the rocket's length, and there are three of them, which makes
six of the longest damn epoxy fillets you've ever seen. If you're like me,
you'll soon wonder why this rocket looked so good in the catalogue. I did it by
hand. My doctor says that with therapy I might someday resume a nearly normal
life.
I also didn't consider before-hand how one goes about
painting a rocket that's half as big as a car. I ended up building an impromptu
paint booth in my garage (plastic stapled to roof trusses). It's not my best
paint job. Next time I find an auto painter.
Construction Rating:
4
out of 5
Flight: My rocket, which
I built for my L2 certification, launched on a K550.
The rocket preps very easily. The piston needs to move smoothly but not
sloppily in the airframe. No wadding is needed. I got rid of the elastic band
that came with the kit and used 1/4" . The parachute is more than
twice as big as I'm used to, so I had to clear off my prep table to fold it.
The Aero-pac retention system I built on the rocket makes motor retention as
simple as imaginable. Just slide the motor in and spin the ring on.
All those fins provide a rocket with barely one- stability. I didn't
add any nose weight, and I spent a lot of time thinking about that while
waiting for my turn to launch. Even at 6.5', this is a very squat-looking
rocket. But it flew straight and true. I loved it!
Recovery: Parachute, PML kits come with elastic bands which they
insist are adequate and which I always discard. Maybe I'm paranoid. I used
1/4" bungee, and with all the separations I've watched at ROC launches
lately I'm moving to Kevlar®.
The 6' parachute brings the rocket down too quickly for
clay. It's probably just right for a softer, smaller field. I notice that
even PML has come out and said that they'll spec a bigger chute in kits
purchased for desert landings, but they did this after I bought my Pterodactyl.
The nose cone (fiberglass) weighs 2.5 pounds. Next time I'll bring it down with
its own 30" chute and let the main airframe have the 78" chute.
Flight Rating:
5
out of 5
Summary: This is not a beginner's kit, because of the fin
construction. Because the rocket is so heavy and the phenolic is so brittle,
you have to be VERY careful about bouncing it off the floor. Ask me how I know.
If I were doing it again, I'd make two modification; I'd stretch it with
enough payload space for an altimeter (may still do this) and I'd get custom
centering rings that would let me 29mm motors with the central 54mm.
(then I'd add nose weight). This is a great rocket for guys who like big heavy
birds that look fantastic in flight but don't go out of sight.
Overall Rating:
4
out of 5