(04/01/04) Searching around on the
EMRR
Affiliates Links Page, I went to Clive Davis' page and found his free paper
rocket: Bif's Rocket Emporium Papernator. After doing a number of
free rockets found throughout the
Internet (See my
"Free" Paper-Rocket Comparison Page), I decided to add one more
to the series. Clive's rocket plan was entered into FlisKits' Design of the
Month and won for September 2003.
I printed it on 110lb Card Stock (Georgia
Pacific brand purchased from WalMart) and then got busy.

The rocket patterns were on 5 pages and then
there were 2 additional pages of instructions. The design of the rocket is
unique and detailed. The color-scheme is nice as well.
You will need to provide a recovery system
including a shock cord and parachute. You will also need clay nose weight.
Clive recommends a 12" parachute and an 18" shock cord.
Clive also recommends that you have an X-acto
knife and wood glue.
CONSTRUCTION:
The construction of the rocket is
straightforward. It takes some time to cut out all the pieces, especially the
fin pods. Read the instructions closely and look at any pictures (FlisKits DOM)
before beginning. I won't go through all the building steps, however, I will
point out two areas that I had some difficulty.
The fins were challenging because of the
number of cuts and folds. These fins are not a doubling over of the paper, but
instead, they are built up and have a flat trailing edge. The leading edge is
squared off and then they taper to the trailing edge. I had some trouble
keeping the fins symmetrical. Three turned out good. One didn't (as you can see
in the picture). I suppose that will provide some "spin
stability".
The other area that seemed difficult to me
was the building of the fin pods. I read the instructions, really, but I just
don't think they turned out correct. If I look at the picture on FlisKits DOM,
it looks like one disk is saved as a bottom pad. I don't have that. So,
builder, it's up to you.
The motor tube centering ring posed a small
problem for me as well. I'm just concerned whether it will hold or not. It
didn't seem to have a solid connection to the inner body tube. Nice idea and
design though... just a builder error.
The nose cone shoulder is tapered in such a
way that it slides into the body tube, but only until the shoulder's taper is
wider than the body tube opening. (I guess after reading that it is an obvious
statement, however, the design works, while leaving a small portion of the
black shoulder exposed.)
I used 18 inches of 1/4" flat elastic
for my shock cord. It was attached using the 3-fold paper method (outlined in
the instructions) to the body tube and the nose cone.
I added a 12" parachute. This was a free
one provided from an order with SemRoc. I constructed it per SemRoc's
instructions.

I added Plast-i-Clay Modeling Clay for the
nose weight. It was close to the 15 grams suggested, however, my objective was
to gain the CG that Clive recommended.
Overall, for CONSTRUCTION I
would rate this rocket
4
points. The instructions were good, but a bit more clarity on the pod's
would help (at least me). The design is nice.
FLIGHT/RECOVERY:
Clive recommends B4-2, B6-2 and C6-3 for
motors.
My Papernator weighed in at 1.5
ounces.
Well, I had an opportunity and yes, yes, I
know it is not one of the recommended motors, but I went for it. I installed a
1/2A6-2 for it's first flight. The rocket successfully cleared the rod, reached
about 15 feet altitude, turned and headed for the ground. Ejection was just
before and the parachute did expand. Flight over.
I wanted to fly it again and when I was
pushing in the new motor (an A8-3), the motor mount popped out. Hmmm, as I was
concerned about. I re-installed it and feel I was much more successful this
time. Gaining solid joints in the body.
After a day or so, I loaded the A8-3 and flew
it again. This time it took off and gained about 30 feet altitude, turned,
ejected, and came in fast. The parachute never came out of the nose cone and it
came in hard and fast. I'm warning ya, stay away from this descending rocket if
it is not under 'chute. That sharp nose cone can hurt.
The third flight was on a B6-2, as
recommended. It came off the pad nicely and with good altitude. The ejection
was early and the 'chute did not come out again. It appears that it is being
blown up into the nose cone and then never getting pulled out. Upon landing it
damaged a fin. So, I have retired this paper rocket.

For FLIGHT/RECOVERY, I would
rate this rocket
3
points. Maybe it's me, but a couple of things were irritating in flying
this rocket. First, just to get the motor in. I had trouble getting my fingers
down in-between those fins. Same issue for adding the ignitor. Also, it twice
had the parachute blown up into the nose cone and it did not come out.
I give the rocket an OVERALL rating of
3
½ points. This is a "free" rocket and in comparison with
others I have done (See my
"Free" Paper-Rocket Comparison Page), it holds its own for looks
and ease of construction. I don't know what to do on this nose cone thing,
except shorter shrouds and tie it closer to the base of the rocket... Well,
perhaps another time.
|