There's No Place Better - EMRR! EMRR Rocks!
the basic, real and invariable nature of a thing!

 

6 Guests On
  myEMRR
[Logo]

REV 2.4 - Tue Aug 17 04:32:40 2010

OOP
Custom Rockets
Satellite Drone
  All   More Like This   Previous   Next

SPECS: 17.75" x 1.3" - 1.4 oz
ROCKSIM FILE: Right Click to Download
SpaceCAD FILE: MISSING - please submit here
REC'D MOTORS: B4-2, B4-4, B6-2, B6-4, B8-5, C5-3, C6-5

Rating
(Contributed - by Kevin Drayson)

[Picture]Brief:
This kit is a single stage, "fantasy scale" rocket, using a ring-fin for stability.

Construction:
The kit arrived with all the necessary parts included, and in good shape. The balsa and the tubes appear to be identical to Estes parts. The nose cone and centering rings, however, I found to be sub-standard. The centering rings were very thin and flimsy- I used them, but reinforced them with bits of Balsa to strengthen them. I'd be frightened to fly this thing without this mod! The nose cone appears to be sone cheap plastic, not the higher-quality stuff I'm used to from Estes, TLP, and other companies. The parts all went together easily enough, but the ring tail gave me some trouble. The span of the fins was just a bit too short, so I wound up having to hold the ring in place while the glue dried. The rest of the kit was very straight-forward. The finished product is a smart-looking ship. The narrow fins that go on just ahead of the ring are pretty fragile, but the rest is solid enough.

Finishing:
Painting the kit is simple enough. Prime, spray the whole ship white, and paint the nose red. After that, the decals go on. I haven't put the decals on mine just yet, I got distracted with some other projects, and the rocket looks good enough without them! Overall, I'm giving a rating of 3 for construction/finishing. The score would be much higher if the centering rings, which I consider a safety issue, were made of sturdier stuff. The poorly-fitting ring/fin arrangement costs them as well.

Construction Rating: 3 out of 5

Flight:
I've had two flights on my Satellite Drone so far, both very successful. The first nearly ended up in a tree, but was recovered. The second resulted in a short hike, but was otherwise uneventful. Both flights were on C6-3's.

Recovery:
This is a very light rocket for the size of chute that was included. I opted to cut a spill hole in it, even before the first flight. It still drifts considerably. I'd enlarge the spill hole, but I'm worried about breaking those narrow forward fins.

Flight Rating: 4 ½ out of 5

Summary:
The final product is a very nice looking, unique ship. The quality of materials has room for improvement, but the design itself seems well thought-out.

Overall Rating: 3 ½ out of 5


[NAR][Sport Rocketry]

The following excerpt is from "Sport Rocketry". The intention is to allow guests to get a basic feeling about a kit. We strongly suggest that you get a copy of the referenced Sport Rocketry and read the entire article. Inside you will find many helpful hints in construction as well as other useful information. For more information, use the two links above.


(Sport Rocketry - Summer 1995 - page 7 - by Ed O'Neill) 

[Picture]"In my opinion, the Satellite Drone definitely stands out among the large stable of model rockets on the market today." 
"The instructions are basic and legible, and lead you through the typical step by step process." 
"One interesting feature is the paper wound centering rings which are definitely stronger than die-cut, but were loose fitting over the motor mount tube. 
"One item I didn't care for was the thin and pliable engine hook." 
"The balsa for the fins and stabs was good quality with the fin pattern traced on the stock." 
"I had difficulty trying to determine the correct size of the stabs, which weren't traced on the stock." 
"By far, the most serious construction problem I encountered was the very loose fit of the large stabilizing ring over the fins." 
"I chose a B6-4 for its maiden flight." 
". . . it proceeded on a straight stable flight." 

The entire article gives the impression is that this is a unique kit, but would require an experienced modeler to resolve some of the problems.

[Submit your Opinion]

GUEST's OPINION:
06/07 - "Just built one I picked up on Ebay. Apparently later versions of the kit were improved. Fins were die-cut and fit the ring nicely. Engine hook was standard Estes type. Centering rings were die-cut cardboard. I agree the instructions are very nicely done. A very enjoyable kit. For an experienced builder enough non-standard stuff to keep it interesting, but still simple enough to put together in an evening." (S.K.)

GUEST's OPINION:
11/99 - "The kit was in my local hobby shop's discount bin- as were a bunch of Custom kits with the old style packaging. Don't know if the packaging is changing, or if the kit is OOP.... I found the kit easy to assemble. I was concerned about the fit of the ring, but I didn't have to be. I cut my fins a little oversize, in case the ring was loose, but ended up sanding all of the excess material away. Kit uses cardstock centering rings-- I thought they looked flimsy, but they've held up well so far. (6 flights.) The mylar parachute material seems reluctant to open fully after folding, but even the model hasn't suffered any damage, even the chute didn't open fully. The ring makes for sturdy fins." (B.M.)

[Enter Rocket Specific Tip]

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
"" (x.x.)

[Enter Flight Log]
Date Name Motor Ejection/
Altitude
Wind Notes
08-24-2003 Donald Besaw Est SU B4-4 Apogee - NC Down 0-5 mph winds - Nice first flight. Lost a forward fin somewhere in flight but sustained no other damage.
01-25-2003 Chan Stevens Est SU B6-4 Just Before 10+ mph winds -
   

Please Help Make Us Better!   

•  Copyright ©1998-2009  •   EMRR   •   Legal/Privacy   •   Disclaimer   •