There's No Place Better - EMRR! EMRR Rocks!
the basic, real and invariable nature of a thing!

 

5 Guests On
  myEMRR
[Logo]

REV 2.4 - Sun May 29 03:10:35 2011

Mercury Eng
Grave Danger

 
(480) 294-5785
  All   More Like This   Previous   Next

SPECS: 28" x 3.0" - 12.5 oz
ROCKSIM FILE: Right Click to Download
SpaceCAD FILE: MISSING - please submit here
REC'D MOTORS: D12-3, E9-4, E23-5, F40-7, G64-8

Rating
(Contributed - by Mark Rose [Who's Who Page] - 09/01/08)

Brief:
A simple mid-power 3 fin, 29mm MMT, stubby rocket. I believe this rocket is meant for those "graduating" from the Estes low power and want the next step up in materials and capabilities. My 9-year old daughter chose this as a birthday present and as her first mid-power rocket. She loves the thing so darned much I cannot get her to fly it a second time!

Construction:
Everything is one step up from low power materials but not exactly a high-power kit (although it could probably take an H128). Tube is cardboard, fins are light plywood, plastic nosecone, and the motor mount consists of light plywood centering rings and a cardboard tube. The cardboard tubes are not the Estes glassine type, but closer to LOC without being as heavy/strong. There are two shock cords. one is a Kevlar® cord (~18") that attaches to the main motor mount, and the other an elastic cord (~3') that attaches to the Kevlar® cord. We built our GD stock, but if I were to change anything it would be to make the recovery harness stronger and less zipper prone with a nylon 1/8" line.

Construction was honestly very easy. This was my daughter's first mid-power rocket kit. We used Titebond III and CA only--no epoxy needed in my opinion. The manual was easy for her to follow and had a logical progression. There were no problems at all during the build. The fit of the materials was excellent with very little to no sanding required to make things fit just right. There are fin slot boxes on the tube that must be cut out with a sharp knife. This was easily done as the tube is not high power tube thick. The fins were reassuringly strong (as compared to balsa) due to the through the wall mounting and light plywood material.

The nosecone comes with clay that is smashed into the tip for proper weight and balance. I added an extra ounce of fishing weights and used PML foam to hold it all in place. This was probably not needed, it's just extra stability insurance after reviewing RockSIM. This was an easy kit for anyone who has built a couple low power kits. No special skills or techniques needed.

Finishing:
The fins were shaped, filled, and sanded before assembly and did not show wood grain after a couple coats of primer/paint. The decals are not that great, being the peel and stick kind. After one flight, the decals were peeling up at the edges. I would much prefer waterslide or vinyl decals myself, but this is a relatively inexpensive kit. The nosecone required a normal amount of sanding to make it smooth. The stock paint scheme was easily copied and looks fantastic with the included decals. From a couple feet away you cannot tell the decals are peel and stick.

Construction Rating: 4 out of 5

Flight:
The first flight was on an Aerotech E23-5T, which was a perfect match for this rocket. Through a RockSim validation, I found the D12 and E9 Estes motors to be OK to marginal for use in wind, so I went with the friction fitted 29/40-120 AT motor. Friction fitting is not a technique I am fond of in anything other than low power, but it was done very easily with a couple 4" lengths of masking tape. The boost was arrow straight, quick, and ejected right at apogee without a problem.

Recovery:
The included chute is a nice reinforced nylon one. It's a definite step up or two from the junky plastic, low power chutes. There was no zipper or no nosecone ding from the elastic--it was long enough--no problems at all. The descent rate seemed just right with the stock chute, not too fast and not too slow.

Flight Rating: 5 out of 5

Summary:
This is a very nice and versatile rocket for those wanting more than a low power kit and wanting to get into solid mid-power. There were no surprises in construction. The materials were very good (except for the decals), and I would think this a fantastic first mid-power kit. It's simpler than the AeroTech kits, not as heavy and with better instructions than the LOC mid-power kits, and is relatively inexpensive. Overall, it's a winner of a kit.

Overall Rating: 4 ½ out of 5

[Submit your Opinion]

GUEST's OPINION:
03/09 - "This is the second rocket I have built from Mercury Engineering. Every detail from the components to the instructions were excellent. I deviated slightly from the instructions in that I used epoxy and added a small amount of nose weight. The rocket does not need it, I just knew I would end up putting an H motor in it so I wanted to keep the altitude down just a little bit. First flight on a G80 was perfect...so it was time. H128--perfect, H180--perfect. This rocket is not advertised as level 1, but it definitely capable. An excellent and fun rocket in every respect!" (A.T.)

GUEST's OPINION:
09/08 - "Mercury has made a great entry level high power rocket in the Grave Danger. Video of a level 1 (H powered) flight with this kit: http://www.cosrocs.org/all%20other%20videos/2008videos/9-13-14/gravedanger.mov Use half the BP provided with the 128, heavier Kevlar®, or both. No extra nose weight required. Since you're flying to 3,000 feet, you need a LARGE field." (J.L.)

[Enter Rocket Specific Tip]

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
"" (x.x.)

[Enter Flight Log]
Date Name Motor Ejection/
Altitude
Wind Notes
06-13-2010 Peter Lam AT EconoJet F27-7 Very Late 0-5 mph winds Event: Serpentine launch
- Stuck a little on the launch rod (stress marks around lug) and did not reach projected altitude. Weakened body tube from shock chord due to late ejection but did not zipper.
10-25-2008 Jeff Lane AT RMS E18-5 Late (2-3sec) 0-5 mph winds - Supposed 7 second delay drilled out to 5 seconds, actually was around 9 seconds. Great motor for this rocket, though. Probably 1500 feet, tremendous roar, startled a lot of cubbies, which is always good.
11-15-2008 Jeff Lane AT RMS G53-7 None - CATO 0-5 mph winds - Reload CATO. Rocket will be flyable after minor repair.
14-09-2008 Jeff Lane AT RMS H128-10 Just Before 0-5 mph winds Event: Tripoli/COSROCS Fall Fling
- Great motor for this rocket, if you have a really large range like Southpark. The Kevlar broke on this flight, so use half the BP provided with the H128.
07-11-2009 Jeff Lane AT RMS G53-7 Apogee - NC Up 0-5 mph winds - Nice to see this rocket back in action after a lawn dart. Replaced the forward body tube (result is 4 inches longer). This is just one impressive flier!
07-11-2009 Jeff Lane AT EconoJet F23-5 Apogee - NC Down 0-5 mph winds - Ancient motor picked up for a song. Nice flight.
07-18-2009 Jeff Lane AT RMS G67-10 None - CATO Calm - Shredded fins after violent corkscrew. Very hard landing for body tube, but minor damage. Blame self. Didn't get cracked fin on straight a couple of launches ago. Will put on new fins.
11-21-2009 Jeff Lane RoadR SU G80-10 None - Unknown Calm - Great flight right up until it came to a sudden stop. Either drag separation or fin shred. Used Microlite, but won't use that again for HP rockets. Back to plywood. Will repair.
12-13-2008 Jeff Lane AT RMS E18-5 Just Past (1-2sec) 0-5 mph winds RIPFlight Picture - 7 second delay drilled out to 5 seconds. Actual time? 8.5 seconds. Problem is, when the nose is down, a lot of the BP falls out of the forward closure and you get this: weak pop and no deployment. Lawn dart. Not repairable. Status: Lawn Dart
01-23-2010 Stephen Morrow Est SU D12-3 Apogee - Perfect Calm - Slow takeoff, slow flight. Approximately 200ft. Some minor damage to rear of body tube during recovery.
02-28-2010 Stephen Morrow AT RMS F39-6 Just Past (1-2sec) 10+ mph winds - Nice, wonderful flight. Came down softly on the parachute.
04-18-2010 Stephen Morrow Est SU D12-5 None - Underpowered 0-5 mph winds Flight PictureEvent: KRASH Site
- Rocket went to about 50 ft and nosed over for a slow trek across the field finally impailing itself into the dirt. Motor seemed to sputter the entire flight.
04-18-2010 Stephen Morrow Est SU D12-3 None - Underpowered 0-5 mph winds Event: KRASH Site
- Again, the motor sputtered the entire flight and nosed over for a lawn dart into the pasture.
09-01-2008 Mark Rose AT RMS E23-5 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds Event: FREEDOM LAUNCH
- Excellent 29/40-120 reload for this rocket---quick boost, ejection right on top.
12-14-2008 Mark Rose AT RMS F40-7 Apogee - NC Down 0-5 mph winds Event: Orangeburg SC
- Excellent motor--quick boost w/o weathercocking at all--did not leave sight, but nice and high nonetheless.
01-10-2009 Mark Rose AT RMS E23-5 None - Unknown 5-10 mph winds Flight Picture - The young person that prepped the rocket (I did the motor) put way too much dog barf in the body (picture whole tube filled)--no ejection. It's repairable...
01-24-2010 Mark Rose AT RMS F40-7 Just Past (1-2sec) 0-5 mph winds - Used too small a launch rod, got some whipping on launch. Still a great motor for this rocket.
02-27-2009 Aaron Tyler RoadR SU G80-7 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Perfect
02-27-2009 Aaron Tyler AT RMS H128-10 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Perfect
02-28-2009 Aaron Tyler AT RMS H180-10 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Perfect
02-28-2009 Aaron Tyler AT RMS H180-10 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Perfect

Copyright © 2011 by RocketReviews.com