Mark's Glider Launcher
(Contributed
- by Mark Recktenwald)
CONCEPTION & DESIGN NARRATIVE:
When out shopping, I usually scan the toy isle looking for Bail Out payload
candidates. Most of my kids' (boys 7 & 9) action figures tend to hang up in
the Bail Out's BT-60 inside diameter of 1.595" (41 mm). A couple of months
ago, while at my local Big Lots, I saw these little foam gliders. They are
packed two to a card for $0.99. I figured there had to be a way to launch and
eject these things and have them glide back down. The kids ought to get a kick
out of the little gliders looping through the sky.
Without any idea of what to use to launch them, I didn't buy them. I was in
the middle of a scratch built sport scale (1:154) Saturn V at the time
and didn't want to start something new. Once the Saturn V was done, I started
thinking of the gliders for my next project.
The gliders are called Super Tuff Mini Shots Stunt Gliders. They are made in
China for Just Toys, Inc. of New York, NY. They are intended to be used in Mini
Shots guns. These appear to be comparable to the Nerf guns that shoot mini
darts.
The body of the glider is yellow
foam, approximately 0.67" (17 mm) in diameter, 4 3/8" (111 mm) long,
with a 3/16" (5 mm) diameter hole up the back. The glider has white foam
semi-delta wings, similar in shape to the Space Shuttle; approximately 3"
(76 mm) at the root edge and 1 3/4" (44 mm) at the trailing edge. The
delta-shaped tail rudder has a 1 7/8" (48 mm) root edge and a 3/4"
(19 mm) trailing edge. The rear of the wings and rudder are cut longitudinally
and crimped 3/16" (5 mm) from the trailing edge to create moveable control
surfaces. A few minutes spent with each resulted in relatively flat spiral
flights that will , drop a bit, and spiral some more.
The first idea for a launch vehicle was a large diameter rocket with the
gliders ejected from within the body tube with the parachute. With the glider's
approximate 4" (100 mm) wing span, this was quickly ruled out.
The second idea was "strap-ons" with an ejection-triggered strap
release. I considered a slotted main tube with straps connected to some type of
piston assembly, but that seemed too complicated. I started playing around with
pieces-parts I had left over from an Estes Designer's Special box. I found a 4
1/32" (103 mm) piece and a 12 5/8" (320 mm) piece of BT-50. These
looked good together with the short piece at the bottom. The I.D. of BT-20 at
0.710" (18 mm) looked like a good size for the straps and the holes in the
rear of the glider looked like they could be used to retain the rear end of the
glider. There was a 4 1/8" (105 mm) long PNC-50 in the Designer's Special
box, and two 2 7/8" (73 mm) long PNC-20s. The base airframe was set.
The first drawn design had two small balsa tabs on opposite sides at the
bottom end of the lower (short) section to engage the 3/16" (5 mm) holes
of two gliders. Two sections of BT-20 would be glued to opposite sides at the
lower edge of the upper (long) section. The BT-20 straps would be topped with
PNC-20s. I reconsidered the use of the PNC-20s. These appear to be the same as
used in the Tornado (Estes # 2004) which I still wanted to scratch from the
kit. I next considered card stock fairings. A few days later I figured, heck,
untopped straps will virtually guarantee separation while a capped tube may
create a little vacuum and delay or prevent proper separation. The straps were
sized at 3/8" (10 mm). I don't know why other than they looked good.
I know what you're thinking: "Hey, this looks just like the Estes
A.R.V. Condor" (Estes #2075). It is similar, but this is cheaper than the
A.R.V. (US $13.29 list), plus there is a local source for cheap replacement
gliders. Big Lots has a ton of these.
The first stability check was run in VCP.
The noses of the gliders were treated as a transition section. The glider body
cross-sectional areas and the airframe cross-sectional area were summed. An
effective diameter was calculated based from this sum. The glider wings were
entered as 4 delta-shaped fins. The tail rudders were ignored. The first run
showed a center of pressure (CP) about 3/4" (19 mm) below the front edge
of the gliders. This looked good.
Even though the CP looked good, I was concerned with the lack of fin area
along the axis through the gliders (perpendicular to the gliders wings).
The relatively small tail rudders were the only "fins" in this axis.
To add fin area in this axis, the small balsa tab idea was turned into a
flat-top fin like this:
This configuration wasn't analyzed in VCP, but it has to be better (lower
CP).
My name is Mark Recktenwald. I used to fly rockets as a kid (between 11 and
15), and started up again about 8 years ago. It has only been since June of
this year that I have really gone "hog-wild" over rockets with my 7
and 9 year old boys. You may recognize my name from . I usually post under
"kentengr@raex.com".
This page was created on October 31, 1998.