There's No Place Better - EMRR! EMRR Rocks!
the basic, real and invariable nature of a thing!

 

8 Guests On
  myEMRR
[Logo]

REV 2.4 - Mon Aug 16 11:38:16 2010

Apogee
Saturn V (1/70th)
1130 Elkton Drive, Suite A
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
(719) 535-9335
  All   More Like This   Previous   Next

SPECS: 60" x 5.6" - 40 oz
ROCKSIM FILE: Right Click to Download
SpaceCAD FILE: MISSING - please submit here
REC'D MOTORS: G80-4T

Rating
(Contributed - by Vince Felix - 03/20/02)

Courtesy of ApogeeConstruction:
Components include: three (3) main body tubes, four (4) main fins, clay for nose weight, four (4) centering ring die cut sheets, two (2) shock cords made from Kevlar® 100# & 300# (5 and 7 feet), and also two (2) Nylon parachutes 60" & 36 ". (Note: Full Parts List is available from Apogee here in PDF.)

The instructions for this Apogee 1/70 Saturn V kit are remarkable! Instead of your typical "print " booklet, you get a video cd and watch how the kit is being assembled. It's like having your own instructor sitting there right next to you assisting you along the way. The video is broken down in segments or steps so it's easy to follow through. The instructional video also alerts the builder of how much and how little use of applying the CyA glue to the vacuum wraps to prevent damage to the wraps, basically the do's and don't's. All of the parts needed to assembled this wonderful kit are all there and fit " GREAT! " The kit once assembled is very strong. As far as tools are concern, no special tools as with any flying kits, in the video shows you exactly what you need to build this monster kit...it's huge and beautifully detail. Some supplies though might have to be purchase at a hardware store. In my humble opinion, I have nothing but good things to say about this kit....no con's here my friends.

Finishing:
Again...the video instructions show you how to touch-up all surface defects and fill all of the body spirls around the tubes and wraps. Fixing blemishes on the surface the model before the final phase which is to apply the paint. The cd also includes pages of art locators one can print from the cd to use as a guide to apply the decals on the model. The decals for this kit are "GREAT"! I personally think this is one easy kit to build I have had no problems assembling . . . peroid. That is how good this kit is.

Construction Rating: 5 out of 5

Flight:
Well, I'm one who chose not to fly this kit for fear of damaging this beautiful model for flight even though this kit was design to fly and believe me folks it's built tough and can handle many, many launches, I'm one who prefers to build this kit as a static display only. Motors Dia. 29mm ( F&G motors) if you choose to fly it.

Recovery:
Sorry...can't give any specs on this section because I chose not to build it as a flying kit but as a static display model only. But from other customers I have heard from, they would rate this 1/70 Saturn V kit from Apogee a perfect 5 if that is the scale to determine the best!

Flight Rating: 5 out of 5

Summary:
I have such "High" remarks about the Apogee 1/70 Apollo Saturn V kit . . . it's unreal! Folks, if you ever wanted a truly remarkable detail model of that all mighty Saturn V launch vehicle that took our guys to the moon back in "68 thru 72 this is the KIT! Apogee Components did an outstanding job on the details right down to the count of those stringers on the vacuum wraps. It took about 2 years for Apogee to make this kit for us to enjoy and I take my hat off to them. It took about three months just on researching the material on this baby. Apogee is coming out sometime in late spring with a 1/70 Saturn 1B flying kit and can't wait to receive it. I already placed my order for it. Listen, I have nothing but good things to say about this kit and I "Highly RECOMMEND" purchasing this kit if you ever wanted an acurate model of that beast, the Saturn V! These kits are so damn good I'm planning on purchasing all 13 Saturn V's to depict the entire fleet that flew from Apollo's 4 thru Skylab Saturn V launch vehicles.

Overall Rating: 5 out of 5


Rating
(Contributed - by Tim Doll - 05/01/04) Apogee Rockets Saturn V

Brief:
The Apogee Saturn V is a 1/70th scale model of the magnificent NASA Saturn V moon rocket. A companion kit to the Apogee Saturn 1B, this is a large rocket standing over 62 inches tall and 5.6 inches in diameter. The large size and high level of detailing make this an impressive rocket. I've built two Apogee Saturn V’s - one a ‘flyer’, the other a display model which is destined for the "Man in Space" exhibit at the Seattle Museum of Flight. This review reflects the combined experiences from building both Apogee Saturn V models.

Construction:
The Saturn V kit can be ordered directly from the Apogee web site (or if you prefer, by phone, fax, or snail mail). All parts were present and accounted for when my kits arrived, however, on the first kit the shipper apparently got the box wet and some of the parts suffered water damage. Apogee owner Tim Van Milligan was very helpful in obtaining replacements for the water damaged parts.

Apogee Rockets Saturn V This is a complex kit and the parts list reflects that. In addition to the huge main body tube (35.4" long x 5.6" diameter), there are three other body tubes, four coupler tubes, 8 sheets of vacu-form parts, two die cut balsa sheets, 3 balsa half-round dowels, several sheets of printed or embossed wraps, a plastic Apollo capsule kit, a bag of cast resin fins and detail parts, another bag of five injection molded plastic F1 engine display nozzles, two nylon parachutes, 2 Kevlar® shock cords, clay nose weight, a decal sheet, some miscellaneous parts, and a CD-ROM of instructions.

As noted, the instructions are contained on a CD-ROM, in PDF format. You'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader (to open the instructions file) and QuickTime (to view the video instructions). If you don't already have Acrobat and/or QuickTime, download instructions are included on the CD.

The video instructions are very good and informative but have some faults. First, they are somewhat time consuming--there are four hours of the video instructions and they can be occasionally tedious. This was definitely the case while building the second Saturn. Since I'd already built one, I basically knew how the kit went together--I just needed a quick reminder of the details and sitting through the entire videos got old fast. Further, it can be difficult to find a specific step in the instructions (e.g. to double check something) so an index would be helpful. It would also be nice if in the step where you add the nose ballast, it told you where the flight prepped CG should be, as it is you need to go to the (included) RockSim simulation to find the CG and CP data (this may have contributed to the CG problem I experienced). I found that at least on my computers, the video instructions ran somewhat better if I downloaded the entire folder onto the computer (rather than running it directly from the CD). I also ended up just putting my old laptop next to the workbench so that the instructions were available in 'real time'. On the plus side, this rocket is a complex, difficult, time consuming build, and the nicely detailed video instructions greatly improve the odds that you'll get it right. Also, although I'm an experienced model builder, I did learn some useful new tricks and techniques from the video instructions.

Another unusual aspect of the kit is that you need to 'make' the tube couplers. Although all the tubes are pre-cut to the correct length, the coupler tubes are the same diameter as the tubes they are intended to fit inside. It is necessary to cut and re-glue the tube couplers to get them to the proper slip-fit diameter. There are nicely detailed video instructions of this process, and it worked out quite nicely. Although having to make couplers may seem strange in a kit that retails for $225, most of the tubes used in this kit were custom manufactured to get the correct scale diameter. Being able to reduce the number of custom diameters needed helped Apogee keep the relatively low volume Saturn kits affordable.

Rocket Pic

The rocket is built as three major sections: the main 1st stage/2nd stage 'booster' section, the S-IVB 3rd stage (which includes the 2nd-3rd stage transition section), and the LEM Transition/Service Module with the Apollo Capsule. Most of the construction is fairly basic and straight forward, with the notable exception of those notorious vacu-form wraps. Due to the problems many people experience trying to use the thin CA technique for attaching the wraps, Apogee created instructions for using double sided tape to attach the wraps (some early instruction CDs lack these instructions, if necessary you can find them at http://www.apogeerockets.com/education/newsletter71.asp). I figured I'm an experienced model builder and I could make the CA work. Wrong, at least on my first try. Where the wrap was simple and straight (such as the first stage Inter-tank wrap or the third stage wraps), the thin CA technique worked reasonably well. However, where the wrap had multiple protrusions along the edges (the first stage thrust structure wrap and interstage wrap), it was an entirely different story. The protrusions simply don't want to adhere to the body tube. If you get a bit too much CA on the protrusion and then try to use your finger to hold it to the body tube, you'll glue your finger to the wrap (I found it quite interesting how much better CA seemed to adhere to my finger than to the body tube). On my first Saturn, I managed to do an OK job on the thrust structure wrap, but I seriously botched the interstage wrap to the point there was no way I was going to get it right. I was so disgusted that the nearly completed Saturn V sat on the corner of my workbench for 3 months before I finally decided to rip off the interstage wrap, order a replacement wrap from Apogee, and try again. The replacement wrap went on much better and all was well with world until I started painting. In the course of priming and sanding, I accidentally crushed one of the interstage wrap ullage motors. As this is rather easy to do, the instructions include a step on how to repair this type of damage using epoxy clay. The repair technique worked well until I sprayed the next coat of primer. Apparently I did not seal well around the repair and when the primer seeped underneath, it caused a large section of the wrap to melt. (Expletive deleted!) So I ordered another interstage wrap. This time I filled the ullage motor and external H2 line details with epoxy clay before attaching the wrap. At least with my previous practice this wrap went on relatively easily, allowing me to finally finish the model.

Apogee Rockets Saturn V Apogee Rockets Saturn V

Apogee uses very thin plastic for the vacu-form wraps. This was done to help preserve a high level of detail on the wraps, but I think they may have overdone it. It is characteristic of vacu-forms that the plastic gets thinner when formed, especially around large details, and the resultant wraps can be extremely fragile (I literally had one wrap crack when I picked it up). Filling the large details with epoxy clay was a big help -- I recommend this step (it doesn't add much weight) - but there is a large amount of handling involved in building and painting this model, and even after filling the large wrap details with epoxy clay I still had problems with the interstage wrap splitting and tearing around the large details. Personally, I'd trade a little loss in surface detail for the increased durability and strength of a thicker plastic wrap.

Apogee Rockets Saturn V Here are a few tips if you choose to use the thin CA method: instead of your finger, use a small steel ruler (or something similar) to hold down the wrap protrusions while applying the CA--the steel is far less apt to end up glued to the wrap (and if it does, it’s much easier and less painful to remove). When applying the CA, if a wrap protrusion doesn't adhere, don't keep applying more CA (it’s likely you already have too much). Use a piece of masking tape to tape the wrap protrusion down, and leave it alone to allow the CA to cure. Carefully remove the masking tape after 15 minutes or so -- usually the protrusion will be glued down. If not then try the CA again. Tim Van Milligan recently informed me that there is a new type of CA glue available that is specifically formulated for use on plastics and won't melt the wraps. I haven't been able to find the stuff yet, but if you can it is probably worth a try.

Finishing:
Painting and finishing of the Saturn V is also challenging. The video instructions have all the right steps and procedures for getting a good paint job, along with a multitude of detailed drawings and pictures showing the paint scheme and decal placement. But the bottom line is that this is a large rocket with a complex paint scheme, and getting it right takes lots of time, patience, skill, and perhaps a little luck. As I noted earlier, finishing tasks such as filling the body tube seams, priming, sanding, and masking off the roll patterns take a lot of handling of the rocket, and it is agonizingly easy to damage the wraps during all of this handling. The only defense is to use extraordinary care and maybe a soft towel or blanket to set the rocket on while working on it. On the plus side, the fins are removable (they are a simple friction fit into the fin-fairing) which simplifies the painting of the fins and fin-fairings. The kit includes decals for all the various Apollo/Saturn V flights. The water slide decals are very nice, and were easy to apply without tearing. A few finishing tips: Fine steel wool works better than sandpaper when finishing the corrugated wraps, and be sure to apply several coats of primer to the cast resin parts (e.g. the fins) to seal the resin and provide a proper paint surface before the color coat. Oh, and don't use Rustoleum primer on the wraps. Rustoleum is a fine primer, but the stuff hates plastic--I've actually had it melt a plastic nose cone. Those thin plastic wraps wouldn't stand a chance.

Construction Rating: 4 ½ out of 5

Flight:
While the kit does not include a list of recommended motors, such a list would be real short--Tim Van Milligan recommends the AeroTech G80-4T. However, as of this writing, G80-4T motors are in very short supply so I tried some alternatives using RockSim (if you don't already have RockSim, the instructions CD includes a demo version which is good enough for evaluating various engine options for the Saturn V). Realistically, the only other "standard" rocket motor that was suitable was a G64-4W RMS, and even that required an extended launch rod. This rocket is heavy, almost into high power territory. Apogee quotes 39 ounces (w/o engine), my flyer came in at 42 ounces, almost exactly 3 lbs flight prepped. I should note that the lower booster section of the display Saturn V came out nearly 3 ounces lighter than the flyer, so perhaps I got a little carried away with the epoxy clay and glue fillets on the flyer. At any rate, there are only a few acceptable mid-power engines for the Saturn V. Someone who has a high power certification might want to consider modifying the engine mount to accept 38mm motors.

It took the better part of a year for me to build up the nerve to actually fly my Saturn V (and to find a G80-4T engine). Although I provisioned my Saturn V for 29/240 motors, I don't yet have my Level 1 Certification (it’s on the "to do" list), so the maiden flight used the one G80-4T engine that I was able to find. RockSim said 470 feet and ejection 0.2 seconds after apogee, but the results didn't exactly live up to that. Initial liftoff was fine, but up and away the stability was marginal, and the Saturn V did a large, lazy corkscrew to an estimated 300 feet. Ejection occurred well past apogee and at a fairly high speed, at which time the upper and lower sections collided. The escape tower punched a hole in one of the booster fin-fairings before breaking off, while the two parachutes became entangled with the rocket body and only partially opened. Fortunately the partially deployed chutes provided enough drag to slow the tangled mess and overall damage was minor. Aside from the hole in one fin-fairing and broken escape tower, one fin was broken off, and all the OMS units were lost from the service module. Concerned over the apparent marginal stability, I did a quick CG check after I'd completed repairs. Lo and behold, the CG was a full two inches aft of where it should have been. With the long delay between when I finished the Saturn V and its maiden flight, I don't remember enough about adding the nose ballast to figure out how I fouled it up, but at least adding some more nose ballast to get the right CG was an easy fix.

For the second flight I was unable to find any G80-4T motors, so I decided go with a G64-4W RMS. RockSim predicted 475 feet and ejection 0.4 seconds after apogee, however of greater concern was that RockSim did not predict stable flight until 84 inches after liftoff. Fortunately, six foot long launch rods were available, so I thought I'd give it a try. The result was magnificent. Apparently the extra nose ballast did the trick, since the flight was near arrow straight, with the Saturn making a bit of a tail slide at apogee before the ejection fired. Once again, there was contact between the sections as the parachutes deployed, but this time contact was slight and the chutes deployed beautifully. I actually think the G64-4W RMS is a better match for this Saturn V--it simply looked and sounded more impressive than it did on the G80-4T (as long as you have a long launch rod available).

Recovery:
Recovery is by two large nylon parachutes, with the ejection break at the 2nd stage/3rd stage transition. The lower main section uses a massive 60" octagon parachute, attached by a short Kevlar® shock cord. The upper portion makes use of 36" hexagon parachute, attached by a Kevlar® harness that holds the Apollo and 3rd stage horizontal (to help protect the relatively fragile escape tower from damage on touchdown). The parachutes are generously sized for the weight of the rocket -- note that on the maiden flight landing damage was minimal even though the parachutes never fully deployed.

Flight Rating: 5 out of 5

Summary:
Overall, this is an absolutely spectacular model of the Apollo Saturn V moon rocket, but it is not for everyone. I've built a lot of rockets (including over a dozen of the various iterations of the Estes 1/100 scale Saturn V), and this is far and away the most difficult rocket kit I've ever built. A fellow Northwest rocketeer joked that he spent 1000 hours building his Apogee Saturn V, and while that number is certainly excessive, I'm sure I spent well over 100 hours building each of my Apogee Saturn Vs. But if you are prepared for a challenging build, this Saturn V has a jaw-dropping presence that is difficult to describe or explain. It looks magnificent and massive just standing there, and it simply dwarfs the Estes 1/100th scale Saturn V model, which isn't exactly a small rocket! While it is difficult to put so much time and effort at risk by flying this Saturn V, the result can be extremely rewarding, and even seductive. I expect my flyer to make regular appearances at our (recently re-opened) high power launch site.

Overall Rating: 5 out of 5


EMRR is please to collect the following information from various resources, but primarily RMR to assist others that may purchase this kit in the future.


FIRST: Check Apogee's Webpage for additional information (here are some direct links but there may be more):

"Random Thoughts" Series by Terry "P'rfesser" McCreary from RMR:

Q&A:

  • Wraps: If you've started, what kind of luck have you had gluing down the wraps? I've got some minor cracks; fortunately nothing is trashed, although I do have some repair work to do.
    • For those who haven't started, some things I've found...
    • 1) Bob Smith makes a thin applicator tip for the CA bottle that does the same job as the teflon tube Tim shows in the instructions, but it just slips on, rather than having to be glued in place.
    • 2) When possible, let gravity pull the glue out of the bottle. If you have to squeeze it, odds are you'll get too much and you'll crack something.
    • 3) While gluing, if a little glob of dried glue starts to form on the tip, don't pick it off unless it's fully blocking the tube. That glob slows the flow of the glue, which is a GOOD thing.
    • 4) Watch the thickness of the wraps; the thicker ones are easier to glue and less prone to cracking. Glue one of these first, to help get the hang of gluing. In my kit, the thrust structure wrap, which is the first one Tim has you glue, is one of the thinner ones. The wrap above it is thicker plastic and was easier to glue w/out damage. Hope that's useful information to someone.
    • 5) Do steps 15 through 17 (building the removable nozzle assembly) prior to gluing on the wraps. Use the little CA applicator for sealing the edges of the cardboard (step 15) to help you get the hang of using the extension tip and controlling the amount of CA released through the tube. - K.T.
  • Painting: Ideas for painting the Apogee Saturn.
    • Having properly painted dozens of Saturn V's I generally used gloss white enamel and gloss black enamel (sometimes flat). I used regular masking tape for masking. I find most masking tape I see today is objectively dissimilar. I think older masking tape used virgin kraft instead of recycled. I think the glues are better today. If you are going to spray with an airbrush I would still use an enamel. - J.I.
    • I like the "Tamiya Color" spray can paints. They go on in a thin opaque layer and dry hard and fast. (The cans are rather high-pressured and require a little practice... it's easy to get a thick, bubbly, drippy coating if you haven't a light touch, but it's worth getting the hang of it IMHO.) - D.W.
    • I painted mine with the rattle cans even though I've got a couple of airbrushes. The key here IMHO is primer - I used the gray sandable stuff and then sanded most of it off like Tim says. I then used good quality masking tape (I used 1.5" 3M blue for the large areas and the thin plastic blue tape for some of the finer details). Masking took nearly 2 days (off and on). I used the Krylon gloss black and for the white opted for flat. While I like the white gloss, I never seem to end up with what I want. For some reason I don't have the same problem with the gloss black. Stay away from lacquer primer/paint; it will eat the wraps. For that matter, go easy on the clear overcoat since the Krylon I used would eat the decals on the corrugated wraps if I got just a bit too much on them. Go very easy and make several light coats when it comes to the clear. Otherwise, just spend a lot of time masking and masking and masking..... P.M. (See Pete's Letter to Tim in News Letter #77 (this is a PDF file ~ 400K)

[Submit your Opinion]

GUEST's OPINION:
08/02 - "I just received the Saturn V kit from Apogee. It is beyond my expectations. The video instructions are great and the detail on the model are awesome! I thought that with all of the detail, this model would be really delicate, but it is a solid kit and is well built to last. In shipping, one of the parts were damaged. I Contacted Apogee and spoke with Tim. He took care of everything and sent out a replacement part ASAP. Great service and he was truly interested in his customers satisfaction. He will definitely be getting my repeat business. I can't wait to get his Rocket Buildings Skills video CD. (The instructions for the Saturn V are all on video CD and are really awesome; in 20 minutes I had picked up 3 tips I had even seen in the past 2 years of building kits, reading books and mags, etc). Great kit and it comes with the RocSim file for the model as well. Can't beat that." (M.T.C.)

[Enter Rocket Specific Tip]

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
06/06 - "Well, I'm now building a third Apogee Saturn V (intended to be a display model so I'm not as worried about flying the 'flyer'. Anyway, I'm using "Plasti Zap" plastic compatible CA to attach the wraps. Much, much better than the regular thin CA. I could only find the Plasti Zap in medium viscosity, but that wasn't a bad thing. It's still pretty thin (thinner than normal medium CA), and while it doesn't wick quite as well, being a little thicker makes it easier to control. The notes in my review still apply - use a metal tool so you don't glue your finger to the wrap - but it took most of the drama out of glueing the wraps. Definitely recommended." (T.D. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
02/04 - "Having done a yeoman's job on Apogee's Saturn 1B, I thought I was up to the task of the Saturn V wraps. Despite being extremely careful and following the instructions to the letter, the first drop of CA wicking along the seam cooked the wrap ($14 to replace). Not having had ANY similar problems on the 1B, I decided to blame this on the glue and ran a test on the scrap wrap using numerous varieties of CA's. The results? Flash (NHP Co., at Hobby Lobby)--never had any problems using this on other rockets, but TERRIBLE for the vacu-form wraps. It ate them up immediately. I tested 3 different bottles, so this is not an isolated incident. Bob Smith/Super thin (blue)--worked GREAT, set quickly, no problems at all. I'm fairly sure this is also what I had used on the 1B. Bob Smith/medium--no problems, though set too slowly for my taste, and more to clean up. Also seemed to form a more durable bond line. Bob Smith/odorless--the most expensive of the bunch, worked fine/no problems, though similar to the medium above. Zap Super Thin/Pink (Pacers Industries/Hobbytown USA)--Set the fastest of the bunch, did not burn the wraps, but seemed to make them more brittle. Also, due to the fast cure, when wiping up the excess, my paper towel stuck to the wrap, cracking it when pulling away. I also tried two CA's specifically designed for plastics, though not vacu-form polystyrene, local hobby shop label (I'm guessing the brand was Bob Smith). These worked OK as well, but were more expensive and not as effective as Bob Smith Super Thin/blue. In the end, I think it just came down to using the wrong brand/type of CA. I'll use up my Flash on regular modrocs, but for the magnificent Saturn V, only Bob Smith super thin will do. " (C.S. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
05/02 - "Cutting the wraps: I found that by holding the knife at a very shallow angle, it follows the indentation better than if held high. You may find exactly the opposite. It's a personal kinda thing. Nevertheless, in a few places the blade left the indentation. I ended up with wraps that had a less-than-perfect cut edge (uneven by perhaps a half-millimeter in a few places). I tried sanding the edge carefully with 400 grit paper. The wrap is too flexible to sand easily… … Go ahead and cut the long edges of the wraps, but leave the ends uncut at first. Or at least leave them a little long. They have to be trimmed to length anyway, and you don't want to trim them too short. 1st and 2nd stage Tunnel Covers: The long balsa tunnel covers weren't perfectly straight but are very slightly curved, maybe a sixteenth of an inch. That's not much, but you can run into a minor problem in "Orienting the Vacuum Form Wraps Part 2". A curved tunnel cover may throw off the alignment of some of the wraps just a bit. Solution: Draw a straight line on the tube where the edge of the tunnel cover is to go, and use it for alignment. Presumably anyone building this kit has seen TVM's errata page at www.apogeerockets.com/Saturn_errata.asp. Considering that there are ninety-odd pages and I-dunno-how-many movies in the instructions, he's done a tremendously accurate job. " (T.M. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
05/02 - "Glue in really short segments and it's easier to go back and get the wiping done. I learned that the hard way. 8-} Also, thick CA will probably be a little harder to wipe off than the thin stuff. … My nozzle section was awfully tight the first time I put it in. A one inch dowel, applied through the top of the tube, is great for pushing the nozzles out without making a mess of things. … If you've not bought some of Tim's Fix-It Epoxy Clay, get it now. Small bits of it really do work well for filling some of those gaps. And alcohol and a finger tip works really nicely for smoothing it and evening it out. " (K.T. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
05/02 - "Glue in really short segments and it's easier to go back and get the wiping done. I learned that the hard way. 8-} Also, thick CA will probably be a little harder to wipe off than the thin stuff. … My nozzle section was awfully tight the first time I put it in. A one inch dowel, applied through the top of the tube, is great for pushing the nozzles out without making a mess of things. … If you've not bought some of Tim's Fix-It Epoxy Clay, get it now. Small bits of it really do work well for filling some of those gaps. And alcohol and a finger tip works really nicely for smoothing it and evening it out." (K.T. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
05/02 - "I _do_ have the skills to build this rocket and I, like Mr. M., thought it best to fully understand and practice Tim's technique. I followed the direction in the videos to the letter - down to gluing on a piece of teflon tubing to an applicator tip - and no matter how little glue I used the scraps I was practicing on always cracked or failed to adhere at all. After spending several hours trying to get this to work, I sat back and tried to think of an alternative method. Tim has suggested one, but I don't like it any better than the original. Soooo, what I came up with, which so far has worked for me, is this: JB Weld. I know sounds crazy, but I tested it on some scraps and the stuff just won't let go. There's 2 downsides to this method: 1) You've got to paint the JB Weld on the perimeter of the wrap and then oh so carefully lay it into position. I marked some reference lines on the tube (one along the even circumference edge, the other where the seam is) and the wrap so this would be easier. I also started the wrap on the tube at the seam and then slowly laid it around making sure the edge aligned properly with the line drawn. Since JB Weld cures so god-awful slow, you can move the wrap around a bit and get it positioned just so before taping it down. 2) The JB will ooze out. Thankfully, have a bunch of paper towels and isopropyl alcohol handy and it will clean right up. Tape the wrap firmly into place at various locations, then go back and lift the tape first used to secure it and clean with the alcohol under it. Replace the tape with new and set aside for the night (or, if you're brave like me, start working on the next wrap). Doesn't take much JB either, BTW. Now, when it comes time to cut the wraps for the tunnels, follow Tim's advice but you'll have to cut the wrap in the middle of the section you're removing since it's nigh impossible to jam a hobby knife (safely) under the edge and pry it up. Once you've got it cut open, you can just pull the cut section (carefully) off. Then take your Dremel with first a small cutter and then an even smaller cutter and grind off the JB that needs to come out. Be careful of cutting the wraps; I used a magnifying glass (locked in a "third hand") so I could hold the tube and the Dremel and get a nice clean edge. For those who read this, I haven't progressed to the third stage wrap yet but anticipate using this same technique. I'm also planning to use it instead of the epoxy clay (which I use and like a lot) to strengthen the fin wraps. My experience only; take it for what it's worth. Your experience and results may vary. " (P.M. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
05/02 - "I don't have this kit so I haven't tried this trick on the part in question, but I did find a great way for stiffening paper shrouds. I used a Bob Violett product called MagnaMat. It is 1/2 oz. carbon fiber mat intended for use in ducted fan RC airplanes and is available from your local RC shop (may be special order). When the CA trick didn't stiffen a 4" shroud enough for my taste I cut a duplicate shroud from the MagnaMat. It is about the consistency of paper and cuts easily with scissors. The shroud was slightly reduced in length to account for the existing glue joint (small end was already installed). I put the mat inside the shroud and used thick CA to bond it to the paper. Do just a small area at a time and rub it down with a stick to ensure a good lamination. When I completed the job I was a little disappointed that it still wasn't as hard as I had expected. I set the lower bulkhead in place to help maintain the correct shape and left overnight. What a difference! In the morning it was *hard*! It feels like a molded plastic part. I can squeeze the shroud and not only will it not dent, it won't even flex! The results are truly amazing. And the weight increase is negligible. Everyone I have shown this to is amazed and finds it hard to believe that it is a paper shroud. A. E. can vouch for this one (you there A.?) I've mentioned this tip here before. Don't know if anybody has tried it yet but is definitely worth a look for a kit of this magnitude. It converts a light weight paper shroud to a damage resistant part of substance that retains the weight advantage of the paper shroud. " (D.B. )

[Enter Flight Log]
Date Name Motor Ejection/
Altitude
Wind Notes
10-26-2003 Tim Doll AT SU G80-4 Just Past (1-2sec) 0-5 mph winds - Disappointing flight. The Saturn V wasn't very stable - big corkscrew all the way up (maybe more nose ballast?). At ejection, the upper and lower collided and became entangled, doing significant damage. Need to assess what went wrong.
04-04-2004 Tim Doll AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - NC Down 5-10 mph winds Event: April Monroe High Power Launch
- Absolultely spectacular. A near perfect flight.
03-06-2005 Tim Doll AT RMS H128-S Apogee - NC Down 0-5 mph winds - Successful Level 1 Certification flight - WooHoo! It 'coned' a bit on the way up, but otherwise was a very nice flight. Cert Flight: L1
05-24-2009 Tim Doll AT RMS G71-4 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds Event: FITS 2009/Mansfield, WA
- A bit lazy off the pad, but a nice flight. I was planning to put it up on an H180, but neglected to bring the necessary extra nose ballast. This rocket really should have a 38mm mount.
05-24-2009 Tim Doll AT RMS G71-4 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds Event: FITS 2009/Mansfield, WA
- A bit lazy off the pad, but a nice flight. I was planning to put it up on an H180, but neglected to bring the necessary extra nose ballast. This rocket really should have a 38mm mount.
05-30-2009 Tim Doll AT RMS H128-S Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds Event: LDRS 28
- This rocket seems to be very sensitive to CG changes, so I added some nose ballast to counteract the heavier H motor. It worked - flight was arrow straight. Near perfect flight.
07-03-2009 Tim Doll AT RMS H128-S Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds Event: LDRS 28
- This rocket seems to be very sensitive to CG changes, so I added some nose ballast to counteract the heavier H motor. It worked - flight was arrow straight. Near perfect flight.
04-21-2007 Cody Franklin AT SU G80-4 Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - first G powered launch.the rocket was very stable in flight.i was able to catch both sections before they hit the ground.
02-11-2007 Scott Grissman AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - Perfect flight. The rocket reached between 600/800 ft. It was launched off a 6 ft rod and flew very stright with no wobble. This is a great engine for this rocket. Rocket had a little more clay in the nose than apogee recomends. PERFECT!!
07-01-2007 Scott Grissman AT RMS G64-4 Just Past (1-2sec) 5-10 mph winds - Another great flight. Rocket has made 2 flights now without a scratch on it.
08-06-2004 Chan Stevens AT SU G80-4 Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds Event: NARAM46 scale
-
08-14-2004 Chan Stevens AT SU G80-4 Very Early 5-10 mph winds - Ejection failure/no way was it a 3,minor zipper and trashed the tower
05-15-2005 Chan Stevens AT SU G80-4 Very Early 5-10 mph winds Event: Launch Crue's Not 4 Launch regional
- Delay failure (only about 1 sec, not 4), damaged tower and RCS nozzles due to deploy failure. Sport Scale competition event.
12-02-2006 Chan Stevens RoadR SU G80-4 Just Past (1-2sec) 0-5 mph winds - Delay was slightly longer than the rated 4
02-03-2007 Kent Wallace AT RMS G77-4 Just Past (1-2sec)
(419 ft)
0-5 mph winds - The Saturn V performed beautifully. She flew strait as an arrow and depoyed just after apogee. The mortor gave a loud roar making the launch very dramatic. The two sections floated gently to earth. One could not ask for more on a first flight.
   

Please Help Make Us Better!   

•  Copyright ©1998-2009  •   EMRR   •   Legal/Privacy   •   Disclaimer   •