There's No Place Better - EMRR! EMRR Rocks!
the basic, real and invariable nature of a thing!

 

6 Guests On
  myEMRR
[Logo]

REV 2.4 - Wed Aug 10 18:47:57 2011

Aerotech
Sumo
2113 W. 850 N. Street
Cedar City, UT 84720
(435)-865-7100
  All   More Like This   Previous   Next

SPECS: 39" x 4" - 32 oz
ROCKSIM FILE: Right Click to Download
SpaceCAD FILE: MISSING - please submit here
REC'D MOTORS: G35-4, G38-4, G80-4, G40-4, H128-S, H238-S, H165-S, H210-M, H180-S

Rating
(Contributed - by Joe Cacciatore [Who's Who Page] - 07/20/01)

Rocket PicBrief:
Single-stage, single-engine rocket with piston ejection system and is suitable for Level 1 attempts.

Construction:
This Aerotech rocket has the standard Aerotech through the wall Fin-Lok™ system and components except the nose cone is a different material than the other Aerotech's. It is gray and presumably stronger. It has 4 fins about the size of the Astrobee D but reported thinner than the Astrobee. Even though it is only 3' tall, the shock cord is 18' long! I asked Aerotech why and they said as the cord gets wear and tear at the engine end, it can be cut shorter. The shock cord is attached to the top of the motor mount using a eye screw like other Aerotech's but for the SUMO you don't glue the screw in. That way you can unscrew it and fix or replace the cord. You can do this easy because after installation, the top of the engine tube is only a foot or so below the top of the rocket.

Also note that this Aerotech has 2 other differences from the normal Aerotech's. First, there is no engine thrust ring inside the engine tube. So you can fit all G and many 29 mm H RMS engines without problem. It does have the engine hook and when using the 29/40-120 RMS casting, you need a yellow spacer (provided). Secondly, it has a piston which ejects the parachute. The piston must be epoxied, not super glued together. The 18' shock cord is attached at the engine tube, runs through the piston and on to the nose cone.

The instructions are typical for Aerotech and are very good. They include a parts list, good photos, spec data, prep information, etc. Super glue is used everywhere except for the piston. This is a level 1 capable rocket taking up to an H210 motor. I assume if Aerotech says it is OK, super glue will work although many I know will use epoxy instead. I built per the instructions using super glue for everything except the piston (using epoxy for that) and it weighed in at 32 ozs. Using only epoxy will add weight. Parts

The assembly process is the standard Aerotech flow, motor mount, fins, etc. Because this rocket uses the piston, there is no metal mesh installed inside the engine tube. Also, as stated above, the shock cord is screwed into a blast deflector bulkhead and into the motor mount but it is not glue in.

The only problems I had with the assembly were related to the piston. First, they supply two clamps which are suppose to be snapped to the shock cord above and below the piston. These clamps are suppose to hold the piston on the cord. There is no good picture of this in the instructions. I couldn't get the clamps to lock down tight enough. They allowed the piston to slide along the cord so I didn't use the clamps. I just tied a big knot on both sides of the piston bulkhead and it worked good. Second, I couldn't get the piston into the body tube. It was too big. The instructions said nothing about this so I called Aerotech and they sounded surprised and said they didn't have a problem. But then I told them where I lived and how humid it had been and then they concluded it must have expanded the piston. So I lightly sanded the piston until it fit snug in the tube.

Finishing:
I painted and put the decals on my rocket per Aerotech's model. The decal sheet for this short rocket is one of the largest I have ever seen! After painting the rocket red and yellow, I applied the decals and I think it looks great. I rate the construction 4.5 because the instructions could be a little bit better concerning the piston and its installation.

Construction Rating: 4 ½ out of 5

Flight:
The smallest motor for this rocket is a G35, the largest is an H210. I flew it on a G64-4 without problem. At the same time, a friend of mine flew his for his Level 1 with an H128 with no problems. There was a 5-12 mph wind and my rocket went straight up until near apogee when it started to angle but by that time the chute opened.

There is a minor problem with preparing the rocket for flight. Because this rocket is so short and the engine tube is quite long, and the shock cord is so long, plus there is a piston and chute that all has to go in, it takes a little bit of careful packing to get the nose cone to go all the way down. If you pack the chute compactly, you can just fit everything in. Because of the piston, no wadding is needed but you have to be careful with the ejection charge. Like all piston ejection systems, if you go overboard on the black power, you'll damage the piston. Aerotech gives you some guidelines to go by. Also, because you can use both medium and high power engines, there are 2 engine spacers you may need to get the engine hook to click in where it should. Also, Aerotech recommends you use 1" masking tape to seal the engine in place to ensure there is enough pressure to eject the piston.

Recovery:
Recovery is using a standard 22" yellow Aerotech 'chute. The shock cord length and 'chute size are adequate for this rocket. On its first flight, the rear of the body tube had some minor dents in it. I don't know where they came from, either the nose cone or piston must of hit it after ejection. The engine is recessed a good bit in this design and therefore the body tube at the bottom of the rocket is a little bit weak. I would rate recovery 4/5 because of the body tube damage and care needed to pack everything.

Flight Rating: 4 out of 5

Summary:
This is a nice short and fat rocket that many people will like. It will fly high power or medium power motors. With a G64, about 800', up to about 2800' with an H210. It uses a piston ejection system so no wadding or other protection is needed. It has through the wall and to the engine fin mounting which makes for a strong design. I have never lost a fin on an Aerotech despite some hard landings. The shock cord is exposed to the motor blast and will dry out and fail over time. Unlike other rockets, it is easy to replace the cord in this rocket. A little bit of care is needed in using bp for the ejection and in the packing of the shock cord, piston and chute. If you follow the paint scheme suggested by Aerotech, you'll have a very bright and colorful Level 1 rocket capable of flying on G engines. I would rate this rocket overall 4.5/5 for all the reasons stated above.

Overall Rating: 4 ½ out of 5


Rating
(Contributed - by Taylor Jessee - 12/27/04)

Brief:
This is a pretty simple rocket to build that is very neat and flies great. It is a single staged rocket, flies on mid and high power motors. Price is a little high but not too bad.

Construction:
The kit includes:

  • 1 4" diameter cardboard body tube
  • 4 fins
  • 2 centering rings
  • 1 motor tube
  • 10' elastic shock cord
  • 1 nose cone
  • 42" parachute

The instructions where easy to follow with very good descriptions and had great illustrations that were very detailed and easy to follow. It was very easy to build--it couldn't have been easier. The fins aligned very well except for one. I had to sand the nose cone to make it fit. My piston was the same size as the body tube which I had to sand for hours. I got it to fit very tight but it bent up the body tube trying to put it in. I gave up on the piston since I didn't really need it anyway. I just used regular X-Acto knives, epoxy, body putty, paint, and primer. I had most of these tools and supplies at home but did buy red and yellow paint at my local hardware store and I got the body putty at the auto parts store.

Finishing:
Finishing was very hard for me since it was kind of cold and a bad brand of paint. I started out painting it with several coats of primer, sanding in between coats. Then I painted the whole thing red, making about 7 coats total. It took about 2 weeks total to do the red. Next I painted fins and below with a horrible yellow. This also took about 2 weeks to do and was quite a bit harder since the paint was uncooperative. I finally got it painted and started putting on the decals. This was also very hard to do. I messed up putting the decals on the fins but the one on the body tube was easy to do. It looks great now. It is a very good rocket but I wouldn't put the piston in it.

Construction Rating: 4 ½ out of 5

Flight:
The first flight was in Argonia, KS in November 2002. It was the last flight I shot that day so I got the G80-4T ready and put it in the rocket. I thought it took wadding but I later found out that It doesn't really need it. I've always put a flame shield in it anyway. It has a engine hook for motor retention. I got it on the pad and then the countdown 5....4....3....2.....1.... lift-off!

With a huge flame, it went to about 50ft and came back and nosed in. Houston, we have a CATO! It shoved the motor up into the motor tube and burned everything. After a quick repair, I flew it again on a G38-4FJ. At end of countdown black smoke went everywhere and the rocket zipped straight as an arrow into the sky for a great flight!

Just this October (2004), I flew it on an H128W at The High Frontier in Pawhuska,OK. It roared off the pad with a huge trail of White Lightning smoke behind it. It went about 2000ft up then it arced and arccced and arccccccced and arcccccccccccced...until it went THUMP and shattered everywhere! All that was left was the fin can. None of the fins were broken, believe it or not! All I need now to fix it is a new body tube and nose cone.

Recovery:
The first flight was awful of course since it catoed! The second flight was great, coming down very slowly on the 10' foot shockcord and large chute. It just missed the trees by about 50ft. The last flight was horrible too since it lawndarted. The nose cone was bent inside itself from the impact since it was going like 300mph when it hit the ground. The body tube was completely torn and crumpled. I can't wait to fix it.

Flight Rating: 5 out of 5

Summary:
It is a very good rocket especially if you are looking for a somewhat cheap rocket for your level one certification. I like everything about the rocket and I would like it even more if my piston would have fit. I would recommend this rocket to everyone.

Overall Rating: 5 out of 5


Rating
(Contributed - by Wesley Egan - 10/01/09) AeroTech Rocketry Sumo

Brief:
This is a very sturdy 4 inch diameter, 39 inch tall advanced model rocket made by AeroTech. It is a stubby model capable of handling anything from G to H power, sports piston ejection, and comes equipped with a 29mm motor mount.

Construction:
The component list for this rocket is:

  • 1 4 inch diameter, 23 inch long pre-slotted cardboard body tube
  • 4 pre-shaped plastic fins
  • 1 12 inch long, cardboard motor tube
  • 1 16 inch long plastic nose cone
  • 1 piston cap
  • 1 piston sleeve
  • 1 motor hook
  • 2 four-fin FIN-LOK rings
  • 3 centering rings
  • 1 bulkhead disk
  • 1 spacer, HP motor (black tube)
  • 1 spacer, Hobby motor (yellow tube)
  • 1 ejection gas baffle
  • 1 screw eye
  • 1 18' long by 5/8" wide elastic shock cord
  • 1 two ¼ inch launch lugs
  • 1 42 inch diameter hexagonal nylon parachute
  • 2 piston buckles
  • 1 decal sheet
  • 1 instructions
AeroTech Rocketry Sumo

This rocket was an absolute dream to assemble. I have already built two AeroTech kits, so I could have built this without the instructions. However, I chose to use them because I am cautious about every rocket I build. I did modify the rocket a bit after it wounded itself a couple of times. Those modifications will be explained in the flight portion of this review. The instructions tell you to use CA glue for the construction, but I used 5 minute epoxy which worked great. The instructions were thorough and had some good accompanying illustrations. The construction started with the motor mount. The motor mount tube has a pre-drawn line down its length, allowing you to make precise measurements on the tube. The middle centering ring is slid onto the "back end" of the motor mount tube with the motor hook under it (unlike on Estes rockets, the tab on the motor hook that would normally go through the motor tube goes the "wrong" way so that it hooks behind the middle centering ring, making a very solid attachment of the hook). The front FIN-LOK ring is slid onto the tube so that the back edge of it is 4 inches from the "back end" of the tube. The rear FIN-LOK ring is then slid on until it's front edge is 1-15/16" from the back end. The FIN-LOK rings must be aligned, otherwise the fins will not fit. All these components are glued into place--and don't get glue in the FIN-LOKs! The ejection gas baffle cap is then glued into the opposite end of the tube, and the forward centering ring is glued on top of the baffle cap. The motor mount assembly is inserted into the slotted end of the body tube and the FIN-LOK rings are lined up with the slots. Glue is applied to the whole root edge of one fin, the fin is inserted into one of the slots, and it is snapped into the FIN-LOK rings. The same is done for the other three fins. The fins are filleted with glue and internal fillets are applied inside the fin-can. The rear centering ring is then slid into place and glued. On the forward centering ring, an airtight seal of glue is applied in order for the piston ejection system to work properly. Tie the shock cord to the screw eye, screw it through the bulkhead disk, and then screw it into the baffle cap on top of the motor mount. The piston cap is glued into the piston sleeve an eighth of an inch from one end of the sleeve. The piston is then fastened to the shock cord with two plastic buckles. You will probably notice that the piston is too large to fit into the body tube at this point. Since I have read the other reviews for this rocket, I was not surprised at this. I do not think that an "advanced model rocket" such as this should be able to be assembled in one's underwear, standing on one's head, and with one's hair ablaze (in other words, "should not be easily assembled"). A little sanding never hurt anybody. I would recommend priming and sanding the piston smooth after getting it the right size to remove the "fuzzies" and make it smoother. Lastly, the nose cone and parachute are then attached to the shock cord. My rocket weighed in at 38 ounces. That's it for construction!

AeroTech Rocketry Sumo

Finishing:
Finishing couldn't have been simpler. Since the instructions just say, "paint this red, paint that yellow," and because New Holland is a company which sells farm equipment that is painted red and yellow, I decided to have a little joke with the paint on this rocket. I primed and sanded the rocket several times but did not fill the spirals as they are not deep. I then proceeded to paint the fins New Holland yellow, not protecting anything from the overspray. I scuffed the yellow overspray on the rocket with 400 grit sandpaper, masked the fins, and painted the rest of the model with New Holland red. I allowed the paint about a week to fully dry and de-gas before applying the self-adhesive decals. I cut out the decals, dipped them in slightly soapy water, and applied them to the rocket. The finished result was fabulous!

Construction Rating: 5 out of 5

Flight:
Now for the really good stuff--the flying! I now have five flights on the rocket, and it is scheduled for three more at our next launch. The first flight was on a single use G79-4W. Instead of using a masking tape thrust ring (ugh!) as outlined in the instructions, I used a piece of PVC pipe with an inside diameter just large enough to fit over the motor's forward closure and long enough so that when it butts up against the baffle cap (used as a thrust ring) the motor is retained by the motor hook. I also put a small amount of sheep wool wadding around the baffle cap to lengthen the shock cord's life. Since its readily available, I use unwashed sheep wool for my recovery wadding. It is flameproof, cheap (in my case its free), and easy to use. Unlike toilet paper or tissue which smolders when blown upon, sheep wool is put out by the slightest breeze (if you can even get it to catch fire). The first flight was spectacular: huge roar, long crackling white flame, tons of billowing smoke, and about 900ft AGL. The delay was right at apogee, the chute inflated, and it touched down without a scratch about 300 feet away. AeroTech advertises this rocket as "a short, fat rocket with slow lift-offs." On the G79W it went quite a bit faster than I would call "slow," but that's just my opinion.

The second flight (on the same day) was on a G38-4FJ. It was not nearly as loud as the previous flight, but it was what I would call a slow liftoff. Ejection occurred just as the model turned nose down (about 550ft), the parachute opened, but it somehow got tangled around the piston, reefing the chute slightly. It landed with a bounce about 150 feet away. One fin fillet was cracked and the rear end of the body tube had a large crescent shaped ding in it. I used a piece of 4" tube coupler to reinforce the tail end of the rocket, put epoxy over the cracked fillet, and added about 3 ounces of nose weight (I was afraid that the tube coupler would hurt the rocket's stability). The rocket then weighed about 43 ounces.

The third flight was on another G79-4W with the same great flame, smoke, and roar as on the first flight. It was noticeably slower off the pad than before and the ejection was right on. The peak altitude was around 800ft. The 42" parachute was too small for the heavier weight of the rocket, and it recovered about 300 feet out with a cracked fillet (the same one that I repaired) and a kink in the tip of one fin. It was time for more mods.

I unscrewed the screw eye from the baffle cap and noticed that the bulkhead disk was slightly charred. So I cut out a piece of flat tin the same shape as the disk and epoxied the tin onto the disk to keep it from burning. I then epoxied the screw eye into the baffle cap. The shock cord is now attached via a quick link. I also scrapped the elastic cord and used a piece of 3/16" nylon rope instead. For those of you who don't like rope for use in rockets, just think about this. What is the rope tied to? In my rocket's case, its tied to a quick link which has a tensile strength of 220lb. What is the quick link attached to? A mild steel screw eye which has a tensile strength of under 100lb. This screw is in turn screwed into a piece of plastic (the baffle cap). Since this recovery system was designed to work in this rocket, a piece of tubular nylon capable of withstanding two tons of force is not needed.

The piston is now modified with a long nut, washer, and 2 eye bolts so that the shock cord is actually in two sections: one from rocket to piston, and the other from piston to nose cone. The eye bolts only need to be unscrewed to remove either section of the shock cord from the piston. I also made a 60 inch diameter parachute out of red ripstop nylon to be used instead of the kit's 42" one. Since this chute is so huge, I turned the piston around so that the piston cap faces the tail end of the rocket instead of the nose end. This gave me a lot more room, but it still wasn't enough to fit the parachute.

I cut off the bottom of the nose cone so the shoulder is now only 2 inches long. The nose cone had a pronounced wiggle after this. I then made a bulkhead plate with a U-bolt for shock cord attachment out of ½" plywood, inserted it as far as I could in the nose cone, and epoxied it firmly in place. The chute now fits easily. The bulkhead was also slightly out-of-round which eliminated the aforementioned pronounced wiggle of the nose cone.

I also made a cool way to retain your RMS casing. I cut out two strips of aluminum sheet 3/8 inches wide by about 2-¾ inches long. I marked a line on each one about ½ inch from one end and made a 90 degree bend at this line. I then drilled two 1/16 inch holes in the long ends of the resulting "L" shaped pieces (all of these measurements are approximate because the device is permanently installed in the rocket and I didn't write down the actual measurements). I procured two screws and in the short end of each piece drilled a hole slightly smaller than the diameter of the screws. With the same drill bit I then drilled two holes in the aft centering ring about ¼ inch away from the motor tube on each side is such a way that they did not interfere with the operation of the motor hook. I then inserted my "L" shaped brackets into the tail of the rocket short end down and screwed them into the rocket by hand. The result is two posts with holes in them sticking above the motor tube. In the flange on the aft closure of my RMS casing, I drilled two holes which line up with the holes in the brackets. If done correctly, this system allows the motor to be quickly and easily safety wired into the rocket, eliminating any chance of the casing ejecting.

Instead of the yellow, poor fitting cardboard spacer supplied with the kit for use with the RMS casing, I had my dad make an aluminum one on the lathe which fit perfectly. You will also notice that the instructions recommend wrapping masking tape around the junction between the motor tube and the aft end of the motor with masking tape to, "prevent any ejection gas from escaping around motor." This is a totally unnecessary step. If the ejection gas "wants out" it could just escape through the nozzle, but this is 4F black powder we are talking about. It pressurizes too rapidly to waste time going through tiny holes. If the piston doesn't move and the motor stays in, the ejection gas will over-pressurize the motor/body tube, and make an escape hatch through the motor/body tube. With all these modifications, the rocket weighed 49.6 ounces.

The first flight after these modifications was on a G64-4W. The sound, flame, and smoke from this reload were awesome! It went maybe 500ft. The rocket performed a slight lean with the wind, my parachute deployed at apogee, and the rocket floated down very slowly about 200 feet away without a scratch on it.

The next flight (on the same day) was on a single use G77-4R. I doubt that it made 500ft; it looked more like 400. The red flame was marvelous and the noise was thunderous! It again did its lean with the wind. It recovered closer this time about 150ft away.

I intend to fly it on a Cesaroni 3 grain G106 Skidmark at the next launch. That oughta be killer!

AeroTech Rocketry Sumo

Recovery:
Recovery, as already discussed, was great on most of the flights, with only 2 issues. The oversized parachute will hopefully eliminate any future landing injuries to the rocket.

Flight Rating: 4 ½ out of 5

Summary:
The Sumo is a great rocket all around. I'm only 14 years old, and I was able to assemble it with ease. It's big, fat, loud, and crowd pleasing. I highly recommend this rocket to anyone wanting to get into mid or high power.

Overall Rating: 5 out of 5

[Submit your Opinion]

GUEST's OPINION:
11/10 - "Basically same experiences with the rocket - a fairly easy build, but some of the parts needed a bit of prep work. The fin retaining rings were a very tight fit on the engine tube, and I needed to chamfer them slightly with my sander to get them to go on. Like other folks, I had issues with the piston being too tight, and I merely sanded it down until it slid smoothly. The fin slots were cut just a touch too narrow, so it took a bit of a shove to get them in, and of course it's a bit squirrelly getting the fins to latch into the retaining rings [Hint: push down on the back ring first]. Two flights so far, both on G80-10 motors. Way too long a delay, but it was quite windy on the day it flew and I wanted to get the thing back. No problems with the piston ejecting. First flight was perfect, second had a minor zipper, easily repaired. Overall a good kit." (M.B.)

GUEST's OPINION:
01/04 - "Your review was great in helping me make a decision in the purchase of a Sumo. The great clearance price at our local KC hobby store helped too, but I am very happy with the kit and my first step into HPR. I hope to make my level 1 with this in the spring but now have the largest problem for this rocket...original paint scheme or using another color like hot rod green engine enamel. Have you seen any other colors done in this rocket to make it look good? By the way the piston was not a problem and I have just finished it a few minutes ago with plenty of room for everything. I might even put a beeper in it. Still in debate. Thanks again for your comments, review, and site. Keep looking up." (R.C.B.)

GUEST's OPINION:
10/02 - "This is a nice kit. I had the same problems with the piston. It was literally the same diameter as the body tube! I just sanded the crap out of it until it fit. I've modified mine with an extra body tube with coupler, etc. (same size body tube that comes with kit) that I ordered from Aerotech and I found doing this helps with the parachute packing, plus it's a much taller and impressive looking rocket! Since the mod it has landed twice in a row with the lower section standing perfectly straight up I've had several launches on a G35-4, and a G80-4, and last week I certified on an H-128 with a beautiful flight." (T.L.J.)

GUEST's OPINION:
04/02 - "I had the same issues with the Piston and the Shock cord clamps. I used tape shims and taped the clamps shut onto the cord to get it to hold. My shock cord failed on its 3rd flight after a slight "bonus delay" the ejection charge fired but it was a bit late. The booster lawn darted from ~ 1500 ft... NC and piston came down with the chute. Booster is repairable, I'll need a coupler and 5 inches of BT. I'll have to fly with wadding and a chute protector as the coupler will not permit the use of the piston." (B.B.)

GUEST's OPINION:
02/02 - "I found the piston too tight also, even if I sanded some, it would not be enough. Instructions poor with that. I simply removed that system altogether and used a nomex chute protector and 15' kevlar shock cord instead - easier. Other than that a nice looking kit." (G.)

GUEST's OPINION:
11/01 - "I have the SUMO and the piston did not fit so I had to sand it down also I wrote Aerotech and they said that they didn't have any problem. Also I flew mine with an H-128 and it flew OK!" (N.L.)

[Enter Rocket Specific Tip]

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
03/05 - "Instead of using the elastic shockcord provided, replace it with the same length of Kevlar®. It is stronger and resist breaking unlike the elastic." (S.P. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
10/03 - "After another club member had trouble with Sumo and offered advice to me for my kit, we dealt with the piston thusly: Since it wouldn't go in, you can peel off a layer or 2 of the cardboard. Then prime and sand, prime and sand until it is smooth again. This results in a piston that I can now literally blow out of the tube. The plastic clips used to hold the piston on the cord don't hold, as noted by others. So I tied knots in the cord beyond the clips then epoxied the clips to the top and bottom of the piston, making sure to fill in the hole in the piston where the cord passes through it due to a deployment failure the other club member had that were attributed to the ejection charge pressure passing leaking through that slot with a wedged piston. Doing all of those things, I certified on my first launch with an H210R motor and have had 2 successful launches since then." (D.C.J. )

SPECIFIC ROCKET TIP:
11/02 - "The piston didn't fit on my Sumo either. However, turning a negative into a positive, you can still use the piston to reinforce the aft section of the airframe." (E.V. )

[Enter Flight Log]
Date Name Motor Ejection/
Altitude
Wind Notes
10-13-2001 Joe Balsamo AT RMS H238-S Apogee - NC Down 0-5 mph winds - My Level 1 certification flight and maiden flight of this rocket. Everything went perfectly! Cert Flight: L1
10-28-2001 Joe Balsamo AT RMS H238-S Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Excellent flight. Love this motor and rocket.
11-03-2001 Joe Balsamo AT RMS H180-M Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - Flight and deployment perfect, save separation occured with wimpy elastic shock cord. This is the flight that taught me to replace all elastic with longer kevlar or tubular nylon cords. Small amount of fin damage.
11-03-2001 Joe Balsamo AT RMS H180-M Didn't See Calm RIP - Night flight with Val's strobe nose cone. Chute got fouled and rocket came down hard. Fin busted off at body, probably won't fly again. Status: Not Repairable
07-07-2001 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - NC Down 5-10 mph winds - Went about 800'. With wind, it was a little wobblely right before chute came out. Almost landed in a ditch.
08-05-2001 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS H128-S Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Great boost with the H128, very nice recovery, landed very close to pad.
11-03-2001 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - NC Down 10+ mph winds - Great flight on the G64-4.
04-21-2002 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Just Past (1-2sec) 10+ mph winds - Good flight even with high winds. Lands hundreds of yards away in empty field right next to tall grass.
05-04-2002 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - G64-4 is a great engine for this rocket. Nice flight and recovery.
07-06-2002 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Just Before 0-5 mph winds - Good flight on a G64. Upper winds made it come down hundreds of feet from the pad.
10-06-2002 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - NC Down 5-10 mph winds - Good flight on an G64-4. Almost lands in a ditch.
10-20-2002 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-7 Apogee - NC Down 10+ mph winds - Even though a 4 second delay is suggested, I used a 7 second delay. Rocket weather cocked some but was recovered with no problem.
05-10-2003 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS H180-M Didn't See 0-5 mph winds - Rocket soared off the pad on the H180. Out of sight for a while. I assume it hit around 2500'.
05-08-2004 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - Perfect flight on a G64-4.
07-02-2004 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - Nice flight except winds blow it into parking lot and it clips a car and breaks off part of a fin.
08-07-2004 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-S Just Before 5-10 mph winds - Short delay causes chute to come out a little early, this was a drag race with another Sumo on an G64.
08-07-2004 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS H238-M Apogee - NC Down 5-10 mph winds - Fast off the pad flight but not as high as I thought it would go.
06-04-2006 Joe Cacciatore AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Great flight on a G64.
01-09-2005 Bruce Canino AT SU G80-4 Just Before Calm Event: MDRA ESL-80
- Drag Sep
10-07-2007 Bruce Canino AT RMS G77-4 Apogee - NC Up 0-5 mph winds Event: SPAARSPAM
-
05-30-2004 Brian Carpenter AT RMS H97-S Apogee - NC Up 10+ mph winds - This was my Level 1 attempt. It was very windy, actually too windy. My Sumo is very heavy 46oz. Nice slow lift off, very good smoke trailer. It came down hard with a good bounce, slight fin tip damage, repairable. Successful Level 1 flight. Cert Flight: L1
11-28-2004 Brian Carpenter AT RMS H238-M Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Very quick off the pad. Couldn't ask for a better flight.
08-19-2001 Kevin Clasing AT RMS H128-S Apogee - Perfect 5-10 mph winds - Level 1 Cert Flight-Couldnt have been better. Great straight boost, piston worked well (after substantial sanding for humidity) and recovered stndng on its rear-end using SkyAngle 28 chute. Cert Flight: L1
06-25-2005 Gary Dow AT RMS H210-M Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds Event: Central Indiana Regional Fun Fly
- My first level one kit, first reload, first and successful Level 1 attempt. Great kit, excellent motor and almost perfect day, started to rain after my flight. Cert Flight: L1
09-27-2003 James Felix AT RMS H128-10 Just Past (1-2sec) 0-5 mph winds - slow pretty flight delay was little long alt 900-1000 feet landed in back of pickup no damage to model or pickup will fly again
04-25-2004 Al Gloer AT SU G80-10 Just Past (1-2sec) 5-10 mph winds Event: CATOLXXXVIII
Al - Nice flight. Glad I reefed the lines about 6 up as I missed the swamp by about 10'. Replaced Piston with Nomex shield.
03-03-2007 Andrew Grippo AT RMS I200-10 Just Before 10+ mph winds Event: Winnsboro, LA
- Good boost but delay seemed to be about 7 or 8 seconds instead of 10 and end of body tube at nose cone was slightly zippered from the shock cord during chute deployment.
11-11-2007 Andrew Hansom AT RMS H128-S Very Early
(30 ft)
5-10 mph winds Flight PictureEvent: ROCstock
- Ejection charge popped nosecone at pad as motor ignited. the rocket flew in circles draging the parachute. Unsuccsesfull level 1 attempt Cert Flight: L1
11-11-2007 Andrew Hansom AT RMS H165-S Just Past (1-2sec)
(1800 ft)
5-10 mph winds Event: ROCstock
- Built a new Sumo and third time's the charm. Flew straight and recovered with no damage Cert Flight: L1
11-11-2007 Andrew Hansom AT RMS G77-4 Apogee - NC Up
(800 ft)
5-10 mph winds Event: ROCstock
- Low and slow perfect for the local ball field
11-11-2007 Andrew Hansom AT RMS H180-M Apogee - Perfect
(1800 ft)
5-10 mph winds Event: ROCstock
- loud with lots of flame and smoke. Short walk no damage
11-11-2007 Andrew Hansom AT RMS H180-M Apogee - Perfect
(1800 ft)
5-10 mph winds Event: ROCstock
- First flight after Zipper repair. Flew straight and high. no damage
11-11-2007 Andrew Hansom AT RMS H128-S Very Early
(30 ft)
5-10 mph winds RIPFlight PictureEvent: ROCstock
- Forward seal failure very early in flight. rocket body tube burnt. 2nd unsuccsesfull level 1 attempt Cert Flight: L1 Status: Not Repairable
03-10-2002 Colin Harris AT EconoJet G35-4 Just Before 0-5 mph winds - First flight of this rocket; it flew perfectly, landing about 500 feet from the launch pad.
10-13-2002 Tim Jacobs AT RMS H128-M Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds Tim Jacobs - After flying several times on G motors, I finally certified level 1 and it flew beautifully! Rocket landed fairly close to launch site (only 2 min walk each way). Next time - an I-200! Cert Flight: L1
10-01-2004 Taylor Jessee AT RMS H165-M Apogee - NC Down Calm Event: High Frontier
- First high power reload. went strait as an arrow!!!Chute came out right on cuenice landing
05-20-2006 Taylor Jessee AT SU G40-4 Apogee - NC Down 5-10 mph winds - First flight after rebuild. It looks even better than before and flies just as well!!!
05-21-2006 Taylor Jessee AT SU G40-4 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - It was such a perfect flight! It was very slow and graceful. It looked like it was in slow motion as the parachute ejected, and the parachute inflated and it dropped and slowly descended.
05-21-2006 Taylor Jessee AT RMS H165-M Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - It was fast going up. The fins have been through so many flights that they are getting fragile, so it corkscrewed about 2 times on the way up!!! Sort of a long walk, but not really.
10-02-2004 Taylor Jessee AT RMS H128-M None - Parachute Fail 0-5 mph winds RIPEvent: High Frontier
- Delay wAAAAAAAAy too long Got grease on delay elament failedlawn dartRepairable need new body tube and nosecone Status: Lawn Dart
06-19-2010 Steven Lohr AT RMS H128-6 Just Past (1-2sec) 10+ mph winds - Great flight. Flown without the piston, as it was very tight fit. Rocket flew to approx 1300 feet, and Weathercocked approx. 5 degrees into a strong wind. Parachute deployed just past apogee, and rocket landed 2100 feet downrange with no damage. Cert Flight: L1
01-26-2002 MikeyR AT RMS G64-4 Apogee - Perfect 0-5 mph winds - Nice, slow flight.
01-08-2003 MikeyR AT EconoJet G35-4 Apogee - Perfect Calm - A nice big shot to end the day with the Boy Scouts.
09-11-2004 Tim Morris AT RMS H180-P None - CATO Light winds RIP - Motor cato. Destroyed everything including engine case, remainder of rocker crashed on pavement. Got a nice chute if anyone needs it. Status: CATO'd
07-24-2004 Bill Pate AT RMS H128-M Apogee - Perfect Calm - I converted the Sumo from piston eject to the standard Aerotech ejection design, then used the piston tube to reinforce the aft end. Perfect flight, and landed standing straight up on the tail.
10-01-2005 Bill Pate AT RMS H97-7 Apogee - NC Up
(~2500 ft)
0-5 mph winds Event: Oktoberfest
- The H97 Blackjack was a great motor for this rocket. Perfect flight.
10-27-2001 Jeff Wallach AT SU H125-10 Just Past (1-2sec) 5-10 mph winds Lou Lou 1 - NAR Level 1 Certification flight (Pefect flight)-did NOT use Piston (no room), used PML 48 chute, Nomex flame shield, RocketMan tubular nylon 4' Nomex protector, rocket weighed 3.7 lb(epoxyfillets/foam) Cert Flight: L1

Copyright © 2011 by RocketReviews.com